All scientists should be unicorns. (Rebuke: No, Atheist Scientists Are Incompetent)
Someone posted a link to a response to Lawrence's Krauss his article that all scientists should be militant atheists. I disagree with Krauss on this one, but I disagree with this response more. The response is written by a Frank J. Tipler, which will here be addressed as Tipler, for convenience (no disrespect intended). All scientists should be unicorns. (Rebuke: No, Atheist Scientists Are Incompetent) Introduction The short description of the article is: Lawrence Krauss his claim -- all scientists must be "militant atheists" -- conveniently fails to address the universe's origin. Here, it becomes important to distinguish between two sorts of responses. Is Tipler arguing that: Krauss his claim is wrong. The counter claim [ Atheist scientists are incompetent] is true? How can we determine that? Let's look at the media network, the author and my opinion from a quick glance at the article. PJMedia is a media company and operator of an eponym